Henry Kissinger presents a rather straightfor fightd statement; his central argument is the security challenge dilemma of the U.S. and the global being amongst terrorist act. Kissinger states that terrorism is the central challenge in the international system, the so-called fight on terrorism. He stated that no president in the U.S. ever faced the great challenge of fighting a war and at the same time rebuilding the natural principals of world lay out. The Treaty of Westphalia was based on the concept on the principles of independent, sovereign states that continue to shape the international system today. Iraq poses a challenge to the system because the terrorist threat transcends the nation-state; it derives in large take leave from worldwide groups that, if they obtain weapons of mass destruction, could cause catastrophic, even desolate damage. The security challenge and the justification of the war are near issues in the war with Iraq. Kissinger is a realist for whom diplomacy is a make do for power rather than one between good and evil. I base this assumption on the fact of his views on Iraq and how the war should be handled. Kissinger praises Bushs when the president chose the Statess commitment to a strategy of overthrowing regimes through with(predicate) preventive war. And Kissinger claims that the threat of terrorism could justify a preemptive strike.
He also says that invading Iraq and overthrowing Saddam could have kindly consequences. Kissinger also takes issue with the underlying assumption of boldness insurance: that the objective in Iraq should be regime change. Kissinger knows that the Bush administration is approaching Iraq the same way it has Afghanistan as a military rather than a political and diplomatic mission. Kissingers view of America is it acts alone, it is in their national interest to conveying to the rest of the world that our first pre-emptive...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment