Does English Law Go Far Enough In Giving Special Privileges To Journalists Who Wish To Protect Their Sources Of Information?

: Does English fair play go far enough in giving special privileges to journalists who wish to protect their source of informationJournalists often rely on informants who atomic number 18 insiders in the organizations which the journalists are analyse . If the usual absorb involved in informing the public about certain matters is accepted , such informers may be said to be acting in public interest but they would still be held liable nether justice for breach of confidence and even criminal law . thence , if the public interest role of the press is to flourish , it is master(prenominal) that their informants should not discouraged from providing information and for this end , the press has primarily followed the practice of refusing to disclose the source of their information . This essay examines whether the English law provides sufficient safeguards for journalists who wish to protect their source of informationIn attorney General v .

Mulholland , Attorney General v parent ,journalists refused to answer questions which involved naming their sources during the inquiry into operation of the liege lord spy ring The journalists where convicted in contempt proceedings under section 1 (2 ) of the Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence ) Act 1921 and both the broad(prenominal) Court and Court of Appeal rejected the journalists claim that they are entitled to keep their sources secret . Thus common law recognized no privilege for journalists to refuse to reveal their sources and they could be imprisoned and fined for contempt of court if they refused to comply with an to reveal sourcesHowever...If you need to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper