.

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

How Would Aristotle, Epictetus, And You Respond To The Following Embedded Argument? Eat, Drink, And Be Merry, Even To Excess, For Tomorrow You May Die.

( happen upon(University(Professor(CourseHedonistic PrincipleFace with brio s everydayness is in addition the chance of closing . How a great deal is left in wiz(a) s emotional state is some issue that no genius could accurately predict or foretell . It is a conundrum that everyone is afraid and yet , as Freud hadmentioned in his concept of destruction wish , it is something that everyone is appetite for . It is in death that one would find pacification . In a phenomenological sense , it is in death that one could be whole or the only time that one s cosmos would be completeDeath is something that is inevitable . Everyone moldiness acknowledge the feature that anytime one whitethorn die . Several approaches to death be made through different philosophies and religions . A famous end or approach in early Greek breaker point was presented through the luxuriant article of faith of Eat , drink and be merry (even to excess ) for tomorrow you whitethorn dieThe first thing that could be extracted from this statement was the affirmation that anytime death may pass away , nobody has the power to prevent it from happening . Since one could non be certain when death would strike , the approach seems to be the best way to racy a life . You do everything you want without limitation to enjoy the life you have for it may end anytime . In a deeper analysis , the statement depicts that the somatic pleasure should always be satisfied since life on earth is limited . The statement seemed to assume that future is rancid and must not be anticipatedAristotle believed that mortal should strive to live in accordance to constitution . A person should not live his life for a day . A person should not anticipate date or fear death but accept it as a single-valued function of nature . In line with this , Aristotle provides three natures of man , the first cosmos the physical nature . It is an attribute the things on earth posses , it is the substantial means of existence . The next is the emotional nature which is an attrbute that globe shared with animals . The third is the rational nature which is a part of man that he solely posses . With this respect Aristotle claims that kinds must strive to pursue their rational nature . Aristotle advised the exercising of moderation as something that should guide a person s life . With moderation a person could be able to resonate happiness which is the final goal in life . To be able to achieve happiness , a preson needs to be aware of his personal nature and talentsWith a philosophy identical that of Aristotle , I believe that he would not advocate the hedonistic principle . The principle espouses overindulgence with the things that satisfy the bodily craving . Aristotle might view the act as somewhat animalistic rather than rational . Aristotle would not favor immediate atonement over long term happinessEpictetus on the other run values contentedment and serenity .
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
Thus he promotes the concepts of sexual peace and the unconqurable will Epictetus principle lies on the belief that if a person let other things to disturb him , he is a weak person . Epictetus view death as a natural thing , since like other things , man is form to die . Man should be able to accept this incident and view it as a return to the holy being and not a lossEpictetus might respond to the hedonistic principle in the same manner that Aristotle did , he would reject it . I beliveve this is so since Epictetus does not see death as something that limits human s life . He also believes that one should be content on what one posessPersonally my respond to the hedonistic principle would be based on the way tht I lived my life . I believe that everything exist for a purpose I also accept the Aristotelian view regarding moderation and happiness as the greatest good .I also agrees with Epictetus regarding his view about death . But , the point lmade in the hedonistic principle stay clear , people have immediate gratifications and death may come anytime Whatever my purpose might be , I believed that it could only be fulfilled if I live my life the way that I want it . I believe that celestial latitude are destructive in my personal growth and moraleWorks CitedSeddon , K .H . Epictetus . The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy . 2006 Retrieved on December 17 , 2007 . Retrieved from the World Wide Web HYPERLINK http /www .iep .utm .edu /e /epictetu .htm SH4g http /www .iep .utm .edu /e /epictetu .htm SH4gSommers , C . H . debility And Virtue In Everyday Life . Thomas /Wadsworth . 2006(Last Name ) PAGE MERGEFORMAT 1 ...If you want to get a in force(p) essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment