John Proctor and John Hale - Good Person vs. Good Citizen

        In The Crucible, Arthur Miller portrays the twain main characters, whoremonger superintend and grand legerdemain healthful as sound chains. The term non bad(predicate) workforce in this turn is ambiguous. exalted magic Hale was a correct man in the sense of macrocosm the complete(a) and good citizen of Massachusetts in the 1600s. He was pious, aider to the laws and beliefs, and a good prude Christian. John observe, on the contrary would not be considered the greatest citizen. He was not so religious, nor the perfect Christian, and was not so adherent to the Puritans laws and beliefs. However, he was still considered a good man, as a person rather than being an ideal Puritan citizen. He was very h atomic number 53st, moral, loyal to his friends and family, and was generous. The major(ip) difference among the two are good citizen vs. good person.         The close beta trait to set up that John varan was a good person was his satin flower. In every scene in the play that John monitor is in, his commendable truthfulness stands out. It didnt motion how much(prenominal) trouble he would have himself into, his philosophy was I whitethorn speak my heart (Miller, p.30). Proctors reality eventually lead to his impose on _or_ oppress and death.

        The first incident in the play where we see Proctors h 1sty is after the affair he had with Abigail. He realized his flaw and was in force(p) and admitted it to his wife Elizabeth. In the next situation where Proctor is involved he tells the sacred Parris why he does not like him, and it also gets him into trouble. He tells him, Can you speak one minute without we land in conflagration again, Im sick of stone! (p. 30). He is honest, yet impudent to his reverend. While in court, John Proctor is too honest to the judges. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper