Ethical Relativism and the Hindu Culture

Ethical Relativism tells us that our incorrupt beliefs tend to reflect the ending in which we grew up in. If this is so, in that location crapper be no familiar clean standards for us to adhere to as nearly respectable theories such as Kantianism would have us believe. Because people in different societies make different chaste judgwork forcets regarding the same action, the joust seems to be, they must accept different clean-living standards. If this is true, there can be no universal virtuous standards. This then leads to the head that coatings are chastely infallible; by and by all, if cultures make the moral laws, cultures can do no maltreat. M any(prenominal) antiquities cultures as healthful as modern, follow this idea to nearly degree. For example, in India some cultures believe it is morally permissible for wives to be burned existent along with their dead economises on a funeral pyre. According to Hindi culture, a widow is required to spate the f uneral of her dead husband and be cremated hot with his dead corps. similarly according to Hindu culture, if a widows husband died far outside(a) from home, or in another country, she is to be burned alive on the funeral pyre by herself.

Many Hindu men get this act as virtuous and sanctified, I however, would describe it as a moral depravity, practiced by a society with no feasible concept of moral consciousness. To articulate I disagree with this because its morally vilify in my culture would be accepting the system of ethical relativism & I simply cant do that. I believe this act is wrong because I b elieve that there are such things as univers! al moral standards. object lesson standards in which murder is wrong, the depravity and subjugation of women or any human being is wrong and I believe these things to be self-evident... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper