Alexander the Great: The Invisible Enemy Essay

black lovage the spaciousIntroduction Fighting has been an needed p cunning of human history since humans evolved. Regardless of the aim, no involution can be made without a good leader. In history, among the beat out military leaders was horse parsley the swell. He was born in Pella, twentieth July 356BC. As a young person, horse parsley was a strong and bodacious boy and brought up as a warrior (Farmer, 216). Alexander fought for twelve age in the Pearsian Gulf, Egypt and in the Middle East whereby his conquests left a legacy that had a positive and lasting impacts in the way of life of the peoples. in any case his conquests, Alexander inherited his fatherskingdom of Macedonia at the age of twenty years, fitting nonpareil of the youngest king ever to be in the manhood. He pinched some wars because of his ability to inspire, lead and motivate his armies. His intention was on constructing a united kingdom, which was not easy during his time, but he succeeded in edi fice a united kingdom. It is for this reason that the development of ancient Macedonia is associated with Alexander the Great because he built cities along the trade routes through the wealth he obtained from the Persian treasury, whereby the economic system remained unchanged manger the industrial revolution. being a huge leader, his legacy is nonoperational remembered for his ability to conquer many empires. He started his fomenting campaign with 37000 men, of which 5000 were calvary. He used this army to fight his first war against the Persian Empire, which almost cost his life. After taking this war, he was able to control half of western Asia. Afterward, he also attacked Syria, Palestine and Egypt and conquered them and acquired the title of Pharaoh of Egypt. He was such a strong leader in the world history who never turned back against his enemies. His conquests still remain in the world history as the most successful leader in fighting and winning wars. Moreover, regar dless of his motives, ideas or views, Alexander enabled the extension of the classical ideas and language to the non-Greek world of Asia. His destruction of the Persian created chances for Greek authorities, intellectuals, soldiers, engineers, merchants and his successors participate in the new political unity grounded on the prescript of the monarch. His successors utilized force to introduce military monarchies, which dominated the classical monarchies world subsequently his death. Furthermore, Autocratic authority became a regular characteristic of the Hellenistic monarchies, which was a section of Alexanders political legacy (Heckel, 89). Nevertheless, it is sluttish that the Romans were inspired by Alexanders vision because they were the real inheritors of his legacy. not only did Alexander left a political legacy, but a cultural legacy that ended up in the Greek Language, architecture, literature and art that spreads into other regions of Asia. Moreover, the new cities t hat were created by Alexander becamethe spring dining table for the spread of the Greek culture. His legacy built the clash and fusion of different cultures that formed the basic features of the Hellenistic world. As a king, Alexander turn out his leadership qualities through obtaining massive empires and leaving behind a legacy that had a lasting impact in future evolutions. Though his empires disintegrated after his death, he had already built a multi-cultural empire, which would ultimately have a significant effect on the Roman civilization. Besides, from the period of antiquity till to the present, he is demonstrated as a military genius. His achievements in the art of war are still shocking. Peoples such as Napoleon, Caesar, and Hannibal studied astir(predicate) Alexander military approaches and acknowledged that without the knowledge they acquired from Alexander, they would have not been undetermined of achieving what they did (Shecter, 410). It is dispatch that his achi evement was a base for others to follow his footsteps. His armies usually counted on him to lead them in times of battle and he never failed them. As a matter of fact, he had a unique character whereby when he usually arrived before his enemies anticipated. In conclusion, Alexander the Great was a great leader and still one of the most bewildering great figures in history. just about of the historical figures do not stand out in akin level as Alexander. He was a warrior at the age of sixteen, a commander in chief at the age of eighteen and a king at the age of twenty. He solely handily altered the ancient world in just over a ecstasy and looking at his childhood in the acquiring of the throne, conquests, marriage and death, it is clear that as the name great suggest, Alexander the Great was and is still one of the greatest historical and political figures of the world. Moreover, as a leader, he showed eccentric resourcefulness both in the combination of using distinct fortify and acclimating a tactic to meet the problems of his powerful and strong adversaries. Besides, though he had a short time in authority, he marks an measurable period in world history.ReferencesFarmer, Henry George. The Horn of Alexander the Great . Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland 500-03. Print.Heckel, Waldemar. Alexander the Great The Invisible Enemy. Canadian Journal of History 1 Aug. 1993. Print.Shecter, Vicky Alvear. Alexander the Great Rocks the World. Plain City, OH Darby Creek Pub., 2006. Print.Source document