Philosophy: Meaning of Life and Worthwhile Life Essay

In this paper I will be discussing Tolstoy and Sartre spots on the gist of breeding by comparing and contrasting Tolstoys objectivism and transcendentalism and Sartres subjectivism and existentialism. I will later conclude why it is that Sartres view resonates more within myself. Tolstoys view on transcendentalism states that the plainly route for you to live a worthy disembodied spirit is if you follow theologys computer program, for following Gods plan is the only way to maintain the two ingredients immortality and an external significance for person lives, which Tolstoy believes are essential for obtaining a worthwhile sprightliness.According to Tolstoy, Gods plan gives things purpose and the value they have and that they are good in virtue of playing a role in the plan. However, Sartre contradicts Tolstoys view of transcendentalism with his position on existentialism, the complete opposite of transcendentalism. Existentialism says that charitable beings were non desig ned with a purpose in mind the only way for humanitys to have purpose in their life story is if they deal one to themselves. Sartre goes on to say that each individual is in fritter away of projecting his or her receive self, there is no plan nor a large picture.Sartre also argues that there is no such thing as human nature, and since God does not exist, human beings must be in smasher of themselves when deciding what is right and wrong and how they should live their life. From existentialism, Sartre concluded through subjectivism that there is no correct way to live life. It is up to the individual to invent their own life and the standards they will use to assess it. We are expel in the sense that we must create our own personal values. Sartre goes on to state that we are born nobody and that it is our actions that start to create the meaning in our lives.Sartre believes that there is no external meaning outside of life. there is no god. There is no path for us to follo w. Again, this is the opposing thought of Tolstoy, which he argues through objectivism. Objectivism is the view that for a life to be considered worthwhile there must be a given set of features defend in our life. Although, we play no role in deciding what incisively it is that constitutes as a worthwhile life and that we have no confine over the matter. Essentially, there is a correct way to live life, and it is practicable that you can be living your life wrong.With myself being an atheist, Sartres views on the meaning of life resonates more within myself. Perhaps I am too young and too naive to believe that God does not exist, but in the eighteen years I have lived, I can honestly say that I have no intellect to believe in God or any other high power. This became very clear for me at a young age when I lost a very close friend in railroad car accident. I could never understand that if God has a plan for everyone and everything that he would create so frequently pain and suffering.How is it possible that such horrible things happen to such good people? wherefore would God designedly give parents the burden of burying their own child, at such a young age with such a bright and promising incoming? And then for people to justify pain and suffering by plain stating that everything happens for a reason or God needed his angel cover version as if it makes it all okay. The pain and suffering goes far beyond my own life and experiences. Why was it Gods plan to have third world countries without feed or water or to have six million Jews killed during the final solution?I could never come to understand the reasoning behind that. So why spend your whole life in fear of God trying to please a higher power that has created so much evil in the world. Instead, I believe that you should live life freely, the way you want to live. You shouldnt live in fear of God and that in the end there should be no ultimate goal of promised land or fear of hell. Why shou ld it be that faith makes an individual life meaningful? When what really should be meaningful is the individual life itself. Why does there have to be an ultimate meaning to life?Is it patently not enough to gain happiness and meaning from everyday life itself? For instance, the smiles parents get from their children or enjoying a walk outside on a sunny day. Why must there be further reason. determine what is right and wrong based on your values and live your life accordingly. At the end of your life, before you die, be able to look backward on your life and know that you lived with no regrets because you did what made you expert and you lived your life how you wanted to and not how anybody else told you to. After all, it is your life.