Shakespere on Management Essay -- William Shakespeare Plays Essays

Shakespeare on ManagementI never knew that Shakespeare had to do with counselling, but after reading this hand it made me realize the true(p) wideness of being a manager, and the way that real managers act toward their employees. I used to think that Management was just about giving orders and retentiveness the business on track but after reading this book I recognized that there is a lot more to management than that. Shakespeare wrote plays that were full of contradiction and ambiguity. He chose many different dramatic shipway of building ambiguity into his plays. He used strong characters, fools, and scoundrels to give his leading different messages. The world of Management also has its ambiguities, and when it doesnt recognize this it fails. What managers piece of tail learn from this book is that there are people who cede a standardised(p) problems to ours and we can learn from their experience.Every book argues that without leadership, managers and businesses will fai l, along with the estimate that leadership is the quality that is missing every day of real managers. Shakespeares characters demonstrated different ways that leadership could be provided. Until the sixteenth century, well-nigh everybody believed that leaders were born and not made. Shakespeare argued about this point of view. Some of the leaders that he created failed because they based their power on the fact that they were born to be leaders. In Shakespeares (Peter and Waterman, 1982 75) the point that Peters is trying to consecrate is that great leaders soak up destineings for their staff, which means that they provide their staff with the importance of communicating motivation. In Shakespeares Henry the fifths talking to during the battle of Harfleur. They are in a war with the French, but the French has a strong defense and Henrys troops blend giving up. Henry makes a speech to them that truly gives an example of leadership. at one time more unto the breach, dear friend s once more Or close the smother up with our English deadOn on, you noblest English,Whose blood is fet from fathers of war-proofFathers that, like so many Alexanders, Have in these parts from morn til regular fought And sheathed their swords for lack of argumentDishonour not your mothers now licenceThat those whom you c tout ensembled fathers did beget youFor there is none of you so mean and base,That hath not noble luster in your eyes.... ...p Peters contains a warning to all managers, disagreeing that if you dont succeed in paying attention to the half-size people, you will fail because sooner or later, they will get you back. They have the power to stop even the greatest leaders. I think Shakespeare genuinely believes this, it shows through his plays how he has leaders learn to people and how he gives the teeny people strong characters. The reason that both Shakespeare and Tom Peters give for managers to listen to the little people is not only because it is of good morals for managers to do so but also because it is necessary in order to hunt down a company. In Shakespeares plays the consequences of poor leadership are approximately predictable heads roll, people fall on their swords, bodies fall to the stage. Although the outcome isnt as severe for most managers, many leaders still make the mistake of becoming royal leaders when thats not the mathematical function they should be playing. In Shakespeares plays, as the author plainly demonstrates, winning leadership is not the result of just being born to do it. Throughout his plays, the most successful leaders are those who earn their nonplus and the respect of those around them.