The first riddle with the argument is that the author commits a phantasm of teaching too vague. The author provides no self-assurance that the survey upon which the argument is informative and statistically reliable. Because the author fails to point out that how the survey was conducted, when the survey was conducted, who conducted the survey and who responded. Lacking information about the number of samples surveyed and the number of respondents makes the argument impossible to measure out the validity of the results. Furthermore, even if the survey is informative and persuasive, but it is a national survey which can non guarantee to bring about the same(p) result in the local place.

It is highly possible that many fresh vegetables are available to the local people.
Another problem that weakens the logic of this argument is that even if the survey is valid and the result can also be applied to the local place, at that place are no casual relationship between the consumers disappointing and the consumers growing their own vegetables. It is most likely consumer only shed interest about growing vegetables but will not really grow their own vegetables.
Before I grapple to my conclusion, it is necessary to point out another flaw that undermines the argument. The circumstance that the gardening magazine sold out in the stand three months in a row...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment